Here is a very very good comparison of UX and OQO. When i say “video reviews are not good enough to abandon text-reviews.” This can easily be a good example. Benchmarks, size,usability,pocketability,screen (this is a new term!) comparisons and even more.
Of course OQO is behind from UX considering last technology. UX has a faster CPU,wireless card etc., obvious things. But OQO has nice things to cover them : Better direct sunlight screen (which is very important for mobile devices),better keyboard, smaller size-it is very thinner and it is important as we learned from Razr phone series, as a jean guy, it really matters.
The UX and OQO also differ in terms of screen readability. The UX uses Sony’s XBrite technology for a stunningly bright, full-color display. The OQO simply can’t hold a candle-power to the UX. However, even though the OQO can’t outshine the UX, it can out-reflect it. The XBrite screen is still readable in bright sunlight, but it’s not as readable as the trans-flective OQO display. In bright sunlight, you can even shut the back light of the OQO completely off and easily read the screen with reflected light. The surface of the screen on the UX is more reflective than the OQO’s, which can make it difficult to read in direct sunlight.
